You can bet it's a disproportionately high percentage just judging from the Zionazi foreign policy of the media, govt, Hollywood, wall street, etc. It's funny we get so many stats on every other race, ethnic group, but not much on this incredibly influential ethic group.
Noticing that most of the people who push anti-white hatred are Jewish is not "anti-semitic". This includes the authors of the book on "White Rage" cited in this article.
By the way, "anti-semitic" is a misnomer. Most Jews in western countries are Ashkenazim. The Ashkenazim are not Semites. Their ancestry, for the most part, is Turkic and Slavic. The Palestinians, on the other hand, are Semites. So who are the real anti-semites?
So noticing someone is English is racist? Additionally most Jews are not semites. You only have to look at people like Nuland, who is a Khazarian, to see this. The Palestinians on the other hand are, but curiously massacring them by the thousands is NOT considered antisemitic.
There are Jews in all walks of life, poor, middle class & rich & extremely rich. Does this mean because they are Jewish, that they have advantages over others. There are whites and blacks at all levels of society, those that are in the groups I mentioned above.
People who harp on about the ethnicity of a person, rather than the heart of the person and that person's actions, are to me the fault in society.
I do however have concerns in applying the above when it comes to ethnicities who harbor terrorists. That becomes a difficult plank to walk the "straight and narrow".
Answered your own question with your last two sentences. Your view is not self-consistent and sounds like the result of cognitive dissonance, which of course we are all vulnerable to, so I don't mean that as an insult. We must all try to be aware of how our human biases in cognition can make us err in our reasoning.
If you think one should be concerned with ethnicity when an ethnic group has a non-insignificant number of outliers who are a threat to others in some way, then it makes no sense to make that exception for one group that has "terrorists", but not for another group that can be found to a disproportionate degree in control of our global(ist) institutions, which control the systems that cause the majority of suffering the world over and are far worse killers than any terrorists.
This global leadership, the ones who pull the strings, are also in fact the ones responsible for creating "terrorists" the world over, both indirectly in giving them their reason for existence, and sometimes even directly.
Personally, I agree with your third paragraph and think it's wrong to focus on raceтАФin both the moral sense as well as it not being accurate or usefulтАФas the aforementioned power-elites are amorphous and better identified through their class, wealth, power, and ideology, while "terrorists" on the other hand are impossible to understand, let alone oppose, through clich├йs; only by knowing what created them and their grievances.
By the way, in the original definition, terrorists are not what you think, and actually fill our governments and power systems everywhere. If you go by ethnicity, most terrorists in the US are probably Irish-American, which should show the absurdity in understanding anything that way. As Gore Vidal wrote in an essay in "The Last Empire":
'It is nicely apt that the word тАЬterroristтАЭ (according to the OED) should have been coined during the French Revolution to describe тАЬan adherent or supporter of the Jacobins, who advocated and practiced methods of partisan repression and bloodshed in the propagation of the principles of democracy and equality.тАЭ Although our rulers have revived the word to describe violent enemies of the United States, most of todayтАЩs actual terrorists can be found within our own governments, federal, state, municipal. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (known as ATF), the Drug Enforcement Agency, FBI, IRS, etc., are so many Jacobins at war against the lives, freedom, and property of our citizens.'
Emma M. - read it and you have some valid points. But if you believe that the US and EU and UK are terrorists, then I suggest you leave and live elsewhere. I would say, as I said in another reply, we have over the last 100 plus years, likely more, have allowed various parties and elites within Government to give us what we have today. And we as the citizens have allowed it to happen right under our noses. We have been asleep at the wheel. It has to be fought and I call government and their alphabet agencies out for going against the American constitution, Australia & UK Bill of Rights. But why has it taken us so long to realize the mess we are in.
And I will take Australia, the US and the UK for what it is and fight, vote or rebel to return Government to the people, if it can ever be achieved, I have no idea. But the citizens are to blame as we let it happen.
But I would not trade Australia or the US for living in a predominately serious Muslim country. Indonesia maybe, Malaysia maybe. Afghanistan, Pakistan, ME countries, no. The freedoms are not there.
And if you believe that Hamas, Hezbollah or the Taliban are governments and not a terrorist organization, then I will have to differ.
I call the US currently as "Not Good Government" and a "Government out of control" but not a terrorist organization. But then, as in Australia, there are people from within our own countries who will decry the wickedness of our countries but make no attempt to leave.
Because in an actual representative democracy, disproportionate overrepresentation of particular groups should concern anyone who cares about fairness and democracy, on principle. You should also care about dissembling on any statistical insights because it isn't done accidentally.
My statement would be, then do not blame the Jews if they are overly represented in banking and are likely some of the richest people in the World. Do I like it, not necessarily so but the Jews who achieved this success, achieved by study, knowing the system, playing Government and accruing the benefits. They have used the system, be it rightly or wrongly, but they have used the system that has been implemented by the Governments of US, Europe, Australia and others over 100s of years.
So, if the plebes, like you (and not being disrespectful) and I disagree with it, have we tried to change our governments thinking? Did we vote according to change of government to combat the predominance of Jewish people in the financial game? No!
It is like the current situation in the US and EU & UK at the moment. The plebes allowed it to happen - it happened under our nose, under our watch and now we complain about it.
Do I like it, no. But it will take a hell of a lot to change it. The power attained by the Elites of today was allowed to happen, a long time ago; in the US likely some 100 years ago or even directly started to change miniscule by miniscule after the American Civil War.
France had a rebellion. Did anything really, really change. From what I see, not much - just no Kings & Queens.
But in my opinion, we find it easier to call out the Jewish people, because they were smart enough to use the system. And others of all races, maybe in a small grouping, have all done the same.
As Trump said re: his taxes. He used the tax system. If it was wrong, then change it. But he did it by the law / legislation in place.
Unfortunately most of us do not have your immeasurable insight such that we can gauge the "heart of the person", particularly en masse, and so are forced to rely on more visible metrics, such as race in relation to the proportions involved in crimes.
In relation to Jews, unless you are exceeding obtuse, you are aware that the Federal Reserve is owned by banks, not all American, which are predominantly Jewish owned and controlled, and those big banks get effectively privileged access to the money continuously fabricated by the Fed, thereby devaluing the financial holdings of everyone else.
Unless you live a very sheltered life, you will also know that Jews, like many other minority groups, are very tribal, so it is not only the direct owners and controllers of those banks that benefit from their lock on the Fed and its fabricated funds, but disproportionate numbers of their fellow tribesmen.
The access to the fabricated funds continuously flowing from the Fed, in turn becomes control over the media, control over politicians bought with some of those funds, and control over society at large.
Given your interest in "the heart of the person", take a careful look at the genocide being committed by that tribe in its occupation of Palestine and murder of the people they have dispossessed there. That genocide is not simply a decision by an evil government, it is supported by a large majority of the population, including many who are dual US citizens, though fundamentally members of the tribe before all other affiliations.
Bazza McKenzie - not certain with a moniker like that if you are Australian or Not.
But as to your points. I see no reason to blame the Jews if the Jews use the system to their advantage and have done so for possibly 100s of years. If a system, law or legislation is in place to use - but it right or wrong - then they have the right to use it.
If we as a voting public dislike it, then change the government and request government to legislate changes.
Yes, Jews are predominately heavy in financial management and banking. But they were on this earth at the same time as Gentiles, Blacks and Whites, Asians, etc. Why then did not these people end up with predominant roles or ownership in banking.
Everyone had the same advantages - so to speak. Asians are strong in business. Many Arabs are strong in business. Lebanese are very strong in business in Africa. Do we complain or call them out for being successful.
And if you were successful in business and banking, would you like to keep your family in the business and build a dynasty? I would say you would if you were successful.
As for Israel and the "tribe" of consequence, I will only say, that I support Israel in their determination to rid Gaza of Hamas. Remember, it would not be happening if the Hamas and Palestinian assistance had not entered Israel and attacked Israelis on October 07.
"But as to your points. I see no reason to blame the Jews if the Jews use the system to their advantage and have done so for possibly 100s of years. If a system, law or legislation is in place to use - but it right or wrong - then they have the right to use it."
This is a foolish argument, particularly when you consider that Hitler was elected into office. Evil is evil no matter how they got into office. You should reconsider this argument immediately, unless you are explicitly government-approved genocide. In which case I hope your darwinian lion doesn't turn around and eat you whole.
"Asians, etc. Why then did not these people end up with predominant roles or ownership in banking."
Officials, many of which were jewish, stole all Asian property to launch themselves into positions of power which they then used to exclude anyone unlike them.
Not certain that I fully understand your use of the word nepotism. As I see it, in its true sense of favoring people by appointment, I have no concerns with that. If a person owns a business and is the director of a business that is his and has a board in place or whatever structure, under freedom of operation, he can appoint whoever he likes to a work position, position on a board, or other - be it family, friend, associate or other.
Now if he is stupid, and we are not talking about that here, we are talking about Jews accumulating funds, banks, etc., then he will fail if he appoints people from the above groups who are unable to do the job.
If what the person does within his own company, bank or business, and it is legal and within Government rules (unless bloody over-regulated), then he has my support.
I honestly think we call out the Jewish people in a context that is not warranted. All the conspiracy theories, etc. But freedom is being allowed to do what you want within the law and within Government regulation.
This is important because there seems to be a group of organized Jewry (Zionists/Bolsheviks/Neocons/Straussians... they've used several names over the years) that has been active in taking over countries around the world in order to push policies that benefit them while destroying their host countries, That is who people are referring to when they say "the Jews". They aren't talking about all Jews, just as people who talk about the Americans in the context of foreign policy aren't talking about all Americans. Indeed, a case could be made that we now have a Zionist Occupied Government in America. This may be why our military has been used for the last 25 to 30 years in ways that only benefit Israel.
Because if you canтАЩt deacribe every characteristic of the problem then you will never successfully resolve the problem. This article simply describes the monster but it leaves out who conceived, bred it, raised it, trained it l, and is riding it through the ruins of the West. Almost every single corrosive and pernicious idea can be traced right back to the same tiny group of people who identify as Jews, thatтАЩs why.
Jews make up 10-40% of the population at these universities. The entire article is about the 1% super elite and if you're seeing something like 10-40% of the population university pool being Jews, that makes them a non-trivial factor.
In addition the Rasmussen data was polite enough to share data on 'whites', atheists, hindus, muslims, protestants and buddhists yet nothing was mentioned about Jews. In several of the statistics shown in the free data Jews implicitly outnumber some of the aforementioned groups yet don't deserve a single mention?
I notice you didn't rush to the defense of muslims or buddhists being called out in the data. Oopsie nepotism agenda away!
You mean like the Jewish community referring, in a broad brush way, that all White Americans are white supremacist racists? Isn't that a disgraceful racist thing to say?
How many are Jews?
White men are excluded from these colleges.
You can bet it's a disproportionately high percentage just judging from the Zionazi foreign policy of the media, govt, Hollywood, wall street, etc. It's funny we get so many stats on every other race, ethnic group, but not much on this incredibly influential ethic group.
Noticing that a person is Jewish is antisemitic.
So the masters tell me...yet the RC obsess constantly on every other racial group. Seems funny, doesn't it?
Absurd...They most definitely notice your ethnicity, even if it doesn't matter to them..
And? So?
Noticing that most of the people who push anti-white hatred are Jewish is not "anti-semitic". This includes the authors of the book on "White Rage" cited in this article.
By the way, "anti-semitic" is a misnomer. Most Jews in western countries are Ashkenazim. The Ashkenazim are not Semites. Their ancestry, for the most part, is Turkic and Slavic. The Palestinians, on the other hand, are Semites. So who are the real anti-semites?
Everything is antisemitic.
You know who your oppressors are by who you cannot criticize.
Tell me about it.
Oops, don't want to get you into trouble.
What do you want to know about "it?"
Just a manner of speaking. I'm familiar with the topic.
So noticing someone is English is racist? Additionally most Jews are not semites. You only have to look at people like Nuland, who is a Khazarian, to see this. The Palestinians on the other hand are, but curiously massacring them by the thousands is NOT considered antisemitic.
The computer study in the victorious Asian students case showed that jews were 500% overrepresented at Harvard, and blacks 1600% overrepresented...
I would not be surprised.
And, this is important, why?
There are Jews in all walks of life, poor, middle class & rich & extremely rich. Does this mean because they are Jewish, that they have advantages over others. There are whites and blacks at all levels of society, those that are in the groups I mentioned above.
People who harp on about the ethnicity of a person, rather than the heart of the person and that person's actions, are to me the fault in society.
I do however have concerns in applying the above when it comes to ethnicities who harbor terrorists. That becomes a difficult plank to walk the "straight and narrow".
Answered your own question with your last two sentences. Your view is not self-consistent and sounds like the result of cognitive dissonance, which of course we are all vulnerable to, so I don't mean that as an insult. We must all try to be aware of how our human biases in cognition can make us err in our reasoning.
If you think one should be concerned with ethnicity when an ethnic group has a non-insignificant number of outliers who are a threat to others in some way, then it makes no sense to make that exception for one group that has "terrorists", but not for another group that can be found to a disproportionate degree in control of our global(ist) institutions, which control the systems that cause the majority of suffering the world over and are far worse killers than any terrorists.
This global leadership, the ones who pull the strings, are also in fact the ones responsible for creating "terrorists" the world over, both indirectly in giving them their reason for existence, and sometimes even directly.
Personally, I agree with your third paragraph and think it's wrong to focus on raceтАФin both the moral sense as well as it not being accurate or usefulтАФas the aforementioned power-elites are amorphous and better identified through their class, wealth, power, and ideology, while "terrorists" on the other hand are impossible to understand, let alone oppose, through clich├йs; only by knowing what created them and their grievances.
By the way, in the original definition, terrorists are not what you think, and actually fill our governments and power systems everywhere. If you go by ethnicity, most terrorists in the US are probably Irish-American, which should show the absurdity in understanding anything that way. As Gore Vidal wrote in an essay in "The Last Empire":
'It is nicely apt that the word тАЬterroristтАЭ (according to the OED) should have been coined during the French Revolution to describe тАЬan adherent or supporter of the Jacobins, who advocated and practiced methods of partisan repression and bloodshed in the propagation of the principles of democracy and equality.тАЭ Although our rulers have revived the word to describe violent enemies of the United States, most of todayтАЩs actual terrorists can be found within our own governments, federal, state, municipal. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (known as ATF), the Drug Enforcement Agency, FBI, IRS, etc., are so many Jacobins at war against the lives, freedom, and property of our citizens.'
Emma M. - read it and you have some valid points. But if you believe that the US and EU and UK are terrorists, then I suggest you leave and live elsewhere. I would say, as I said in another reply, we have over the last 100 plus years, likely more, have allowed various parties and elites within Government to give us what we have today. And we as the citizens have allowed it to happen right under our noses. We have been asleep at the wheel. It has to be fought and I call government and their alphabet agencies out for going against the American constitution, Australia & UK Bill of Rights. But why has it taken us so long to realize the mess we are in.
And I will take Australia, the US and the UK for what it is and fight, vote or rebel to return Government to the people, if it can ever be achieved, I have no idea. But the citizens are to blame as we let it happen.
But I would not trade Australia or the US for living in a predominately serious Muslim country. Indonesia maybe, Malaysia maybe. Afghanistan, Pakistan, ME countries, no. The freedoms are not there.
And if you believe that Hamas, Hezbollah or the Taliban are governments and not a terrorist organization, then I will have to differ.
I call the US currently as "Not Good Government" and a "Government out of control" but not a terrorist organization. But then, as in Australia, there are people from within our own countries who will decry the wickedness of our countries but make no attempt to leave.
Because in an actual representative democracy, disproportionate overrepresentation of particular groups should concern anyone who cares about fairness and democracy, on principle. You should also care about dissembling on any statistical insights because it isn't done accidentally.
My statement would be, then do not blame the Jews if they are overly represented in banking and are likely some of the richest people in the World. Do I like it, not necessarily so but the Jews who achieved this success, achieved by study, knowing the system, playing Government and accruing the benefits. They have used the system, be it rightly or wrongly, but they have used the system that has been implemented by the Governments of US, Europe, Australia and others over 100s of years.
So, if the plebes, like you (and not being disrespectful) and I disagree with it, have we tried to change our governments thinking? Did we vote according to change of government to combat the predominance of Jewish people in the financial game? No!
It is like the current situation in the US and EU & UK at the moment. The plebes allowed it to happen - it happened under our nose, under our watch and now we complain about it.
Do I like it, no. But it will take a hell of a lot to change it. The power attained by the Elites of today was allowed to happen, a long time ago; in the US likely some 100 years ago or even directly started to change miniscule by miniscule after the American Civil War.
France had a rebellion. Did anything really, really change. From what I see, not much - just no Kings & Queens.
But in my opinion, we find it easier to call out the Jewish people, because they were smart enough to use the system. And others of all races, maybe in a small grouping, have all done the same.
As Trump said re: his taxes. He used the tax system. If it was wrong, then change it. But he did it by the law / legislation in place.
Unfortunately most of us do not have your immeasurable insight such that we can gauge the "heart of the person", particularly en masse, and so are forced to rely on more visible metrics, such as race in relation to the proportions involved in crimes.
In relation to Jews, unless you are exceeding obtuse, you are aware that the Federal Reserve is owned by banks, not all American, which are predominantly Jewish owned and controlled, and those big banks get effectively privileged access to the money continuously fabricated by the Fed, thereby devaluing the financial holdings of everyone else.
Unless you live a very sheltered life, you will also know that Jews, like many other minority groups, are very tribal, so it is not only the direct owners and controllers of those banks that benefit from their lock on the Fed and its fabricated funds, but disproportionate numbers of their fellow tribesmen.
The access to the fabricated funds continuously flowing from the Fed, in turn becomes control over the media, control over politicians bought with some of those funds, and control over society at large.
Given your interest in "the heart of the person", take a careful look at the genocide being committed by that tribe in its occupation of Palestine and murder of the people they have dispossessed there. That genocide is not simply a decision by an evil government, it is supported by a large majority of the population, including many who are dual US citizens, though fundamentally members of the tribe before all other affiliations.
Bazza McKenzie - not certain with a moniker like that if you are Australian or Not.
But as to your points. I see no reason to blame the Jews if the Jews use the system to their advantage and have done so for possibly 100s of years. If a system, law or legislation is in place to use - but it right or wrong - then they have the right to use it.
If we as a voting public dislike it, then change the government and request government to legislate changes.
Yes, Jews are predominately heavy in financial management and banking. But they were on this earth at the same time as Gentiles, Blacks and Whites, Asians, etc. Why then did not these people end up with predominant roles or ownership in banking.
Everyone had the same advantages - so to speak. Asians are strong in business. Many Arabs are strong in business. Lebanese are very strong in business in Africa. Do we complain or call them out for being successful.
And if you were successful in business and banking, would you like to keep your family in the business and build a dynasty? I would say you would if you were successful.
As for Israel and the "tribe" of consequence, I will only say, that I support Israel in their determination to rid Gaza of Hamas. Remember, it would not be happening if the Hamas and Palestinian assistance had not entered Israel and attacked Israelis on October 07.
Using the system to your advantage at the expense of the rest of us is the problem.
Hear! Hear!!!
"But as to your points. I see no reason to blame the Jews if the Jews use the system to their advantage and have done so for possibly 100s of years. If a system, law or legislation is in place to use - but it right or wrong - then they have the right to use it."
This is a foolish argument, particularly when you consider that Hitler was elected into office. Evil is evil no matter how they got into office. You should reconsider this argument immediately, unless you are explicitly government-approved genocide. In which case I hope your darwinian lion doesn't turn around and eat you whole.
"Asians, etc. Why then did not these people end up with predominant roles or ownership in banking."
Officials, many of which were jewish, stole all Asian property to launch themselves into positions of power which they then used to exclude anyone unlike them.
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-power-of-organized-crime/
The recent lawsuits from asians also show an illegal discrimination for jews/blacks and against asians.
Your answer would be "nepotism at an industrial scale". As well as it being a general diversity of opinion issue.
Not certain that I fully understand your use of the word nepotism. As I see it, in its true sense of favoring people by appointment, I have no concerns with that. If a person owns a business and is the director of a business that is his and has a board in place or whatever structure, under freedom of operation, he can appoint whoever he likes to a work position, position on a board, or other - be it family, friend, associate or other.
Now if he is stupid, and we are not talking about that here, we are talking about Jews accumulating funds, banks, etc., then he will fail if he appoints people from the above groups who are unable to do the job.
If what the person does within his own company, bank or business, and it is legal and within Government rules (unless bloody over-regulated), then he has my support.
I honestly think we call out the Jewish people in a context that is not warranted. All the conspiracy theories, etc. But freedom is being allowed to do what you want within the law and within Government regulation.
This is important because there seems to be a group of organized Jewry (Zionists/Bolsheviks/Neocons/Straussians... they've used several names over the years) that has been active in taking over countries around the world in order to push policies that benefit them while destroying their host countries, That is who people are referring to when they say "the Jews". They aren't talking about all Jews, just as people who talk about the Americans in the context of foreign policy aren't talking about all Americans. Indeed, a case could be made that we now have a Zionist Occupied Government in America. This may be why our military has been used for the last 25 to 30 years in ways that only benefit Israel.
Because if you canтАЩt deacribe every characteristic of the problem then you will never successfully resolve the problem. This article simply describes the monster but it leaves out who conceived, bred it, raised it, trained it l, and is riding it through the ruins of the West. Almost every single corrosive and pernicious idea can be traced right back to the same tiny group of people who identify as Jews, thatтАЩs why.
Ahhhh hahahaha.
Jews make up 10-40% of the population at these universities. The entire article is about the 1% super elite and if you're seeing something like 10-40% of the population university pool being Jews, that makes them a non-trivial factor.
In addition the Rasmussen data was polite enough to share data on 'whites', atheists, hindus, muslims, protestants and buddhists yet nothing was mentioned about Jews. In several of the statistics shown in the free data Jews implicitly outnumber some of the aforementioned groups yet don't deserve a single mention?
I notice you didn't rush to the defense of muslims or buddhists being called out in the data. Oopsie nepotism agenda away!
A disgracefully racist thing to say
Yes, but is it true or not ?
You mean like the Jewish community referring, in a broad brush way, that all White Americans are white supremacist racists? Isn't that a disgraceful racist thing to say?
the same is true in art and culture ...
check this out
https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/f4-large.jpg
from
https://www.unz.com/runz/jews-and-antisemitism-at-harvard-university/